What were the differences between the laws of Britains court and those of the International Military Tribunal?
Q. My high performance english/social studies class is re-creating the Nuremberg Trials and I'm a judge (Norman Birkett). I need to give a 5 minute speech at the begining and I'm almost done but I just need to put in some differences between Britain's court at the time and the courtroom of the International Military Tribunal (USA, France, USSR, and Britain). Sources would be nice.
Asked by hrhitta247 - Fri May 4 12:02:40 2007 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I hope you can find the differences here: good luck on your speech.
Answered by Josephine - Sat May 5 01:28:56 2007
Q. My high performance english/social studies class is re-creating the Nuremberg Trials and I'm a judge (Norman Birkett). I need to give a 5 minute speech at the begining and I'm almost done but I just need to put in some differences between Britain's court at the time and the courtroom of the International Military Tribunal (USA, France, USSR, and Britain). Sources would be nice.
Asked by hrhitta247 - Fri May 4 12:02:40 2007 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I hope you can find the differences here: good luck on your speech.
Answered by Josephine - Sat May 5 01:28:56 2007
Why The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence?
Q. The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence. Article 19 of the Statutes of the International Military Tribunal (in reality: the Inter-allied Military Tribunal) at Nuremberg The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge, but shall take judicial notice thereof. Article 21 of the Statutes No one, not even those individuals who regard the Third Reich with nostalgia, denies the existence of concentration camps under Hitler. Everyone also recognizes that certain camps were equipped with crematory ovens: instead of being buried, the corpses were reduced to ashes. The repeated occurrence of epidemics made cremation necessary, especially for those who had died of typhus (see the photos of mass… [cont.]
Asked by mukto_mona - Sun Jul 12 07:07:41 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Pretty much what you've said, I guess. Simply that the Tribunal would not have to prove to the normal legal standard those things that were, as it says, common knowledge, such as the existence of the extermination camps (something which the Allies didn't really comment on until, I believe, around 1944, and the Vatican not at all apparently). Obviously, this was to expedite hearings, and not allow them to be bogged down in petty argument over everyday things. Maybe there was a little self-aggrandisement there, this wanting to appear to only deal with lofty issues, and perhaps more than a little desire to get the trials done quickly and get on to punishing those found guilty. As for the rest, I'm not sure if you are saying that… [cont.]
Answered by The Grappler - Sun Jul 12 07:32:44 2009
Q. The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence. Article 19 of the Statutes of the International Military Tribunal (in reality: the Inter-allied Military Tribunal) at Nuremberg The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge, but shall take judicial notice thereof. Article 21 of the Statutes No one, not even those individuals who regard the Third Reich with nostalgia, denies the existence of concentration camps under Hitler. Everyone also recognizes that certain camps were equipped with crematory ovens: instead of being buried, the corpses were reduced to ashes. The repeated occurrence of epidemics made cremation necessary, especially for those who had died of typhus (see the photos of mass… [cont.]
Asked by mukto_mona - Sun Jul 12 07:07:41 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Pretty much what you've said, I guess. Simply that the Tribunal would not have to prove to the normal legal standard those things that were, as it says, common knowledge, such as the existence of the extermination camps (something which the Allies didn't really comment on until, I believe, around 1944, and the Vatican not at all apparently). Obviously, this was to expedite hearings, and not allow them to be bogged down in petty argument over everyday things. Maybe there was a little self-aggrandisement there, this wanting to appear to only deal with lofty issues, and perhaps more than a little desire to get the trials done quickly and get on to punishing those found guilty. As for the rest, I'm not sure if you are saying that… [cont.]
Answered by The Grappler - Sun Jul 12 07:32:44 2009
War crimes, Is the investigation over interrogation a useful distraction from Bush's "supreme crime"?
Q. The International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, which followed World War II, called the waging of aggressive war "essentially an evil thing...to initiate a war of aggression...is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime, differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole." Source(s)
Asked by . - Wed Apr 22 10:27:05 2009 - - 18 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Not as far as I'm concerned. But I will take what I can get for now and hope there is more offered up in the subsequent days and months. One of my contacts had suggested to me that President Obama is being very careful about how he allows this all to proceed. By allowing a ground swell to develop until there is no choice but to prosecute these guys. At the time, I thought he was giving the president an 'out'. But maybe he was onto something there?
Answered by G. - Wed Apr 22 11:34:36 2009
Q. The International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, which followed World War II, called the waging of aggressive war "essentially an evil thing...to initiate a war of aggression...is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime, differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole." Source(s)
Asked by . - Wed Apr 22 10:27:05 2009 - - 18 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Not as far as I'm concerned. But I will take what I can get for now and hope there is more offered up in the subsequent days and months. One of my contacts had suggested to me that President Obama is being very careful about how he allows this all to proceed. By allowing a ground swell to develop until there is no choice but to prosecute these guys. At the time, I thought he was giving the president an 'out'. But maybe he was onto something there?
Answered by G. - Wed Apr 22 11:34:36 2009
The Nuremberg Trials?
Q. I Have to write a research paper and i have to have three body paragraphs. My first paragraph is In November of 1945 three countries sat down to decide the fate of the Nazi criminals. The United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union created the IMT(International Military Tribunal). The judges accused over 30 criminals of committing harm to the Jews. Three main court cases were tried; Crimes Against Humanaties,Crimes against Peace, and War crimes. The IMT deliberated for over a year and finally reached their verdict. Over 12 Germans were sentenced to death, 20 were sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Hermann Goering was the third highest ranking Nazi official but escaped death by committing suicide in… [cont.]
Asked by Loving You - Sun Apr 19 17:45:14 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A.
Answered by unknown - Sun Apr 19 17:53:08 2009
Q. I Have to write a research paper and i have to have three body paragraphs. My first paragraph is In November of 1945 three countries sat down to decide the fate of the Nazi criminals. The United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union created the IMT(International Military Tribunal). The judges accused over 30 criminals of committing harm to the Jews. Three main court cases were tried; Crimes Against Humanaties,Crimes against Peace, and War crimes. The IMT deliberated for over a year and finally reached their verdict. Over 12 Germans were sentenced to death, 20 were sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Hermann Goering was the third highest ranking Nazi official but escaped death by committing suicide in… [cont.]
Asked by Loving You - Sun Apr 19 17:45:14 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A.
Answered by unknown - Sun Apr 19 17:53:08 2009
Whats is the most compelling evidence of the Holocaust, from this table?
Q. Evidence which has all since disappeared: 1. The two shrunken heads, Amazonian style 2. The "human skin" lampshade 3. The organs preserved in formaldehyde, like at school 4. The dead skin mask, very popular before photography was common 5. The tattooed skin (tattoos forbidden in Judaism) Photo of the table of evidence found at Buchenwald death camp, film footage of which was shown at Nuremberg. ___ The International Military Tribunal for Germany Nuremberg, Germany Transcript - Volume III - 515 13 Dec. 45 This document is also attached to this exhibit on the board. We do not wish to dwell on this pathological phase of the Nazi culture; but we do feel compelled to offer one additional exhibit, which we over as Exhibit Number USA-254.… [cont.]
Asked by The Black Rabbit of Inle - Thu May 6 23:49:48 2010 - - 10 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I'd say it's more the piles of photos and the German record keeping.
Answered by The Great Gazoo - Thu May 6 23:58:26 2010
Q. Evidence which has all since disappeared: 1. The two shrunken heads, Amazonian style 2. The "human skin" lampshade 3. The organs preserved in formaldehyde, like at school 4. The dead skin mask, very popular before photography was common 5. The tattooed skin (tattoos forbidden in Judaism) Photo of the table of evidence found at Buchenwald death camp, film footage of which was shown at Nuremberg. ___ The International Military Tribunal for Germany Nuremberg, Germany Transcript - Volume III - 515 13 Dec. 45 This document is also attached to this exhibit on the board. We do not wish to dwell on this pathological phase of the Nazi culture; but we do feel compelled to offer one additional exhibit, which we over as Exhibit Number USA-254.… [cont.]
Asked by The Black Rabbit of Inle - Thu May 6 23:49:48 2010 - - 10 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I'd say it's more the piles of photos and the German record keeping.
Answered by The Great Gazoo - Thu May 6 23:58:26 2010
Please vote. If Bush decides to attack Iran, do you agree with him?
Q. According to the "Sixth Article" of "Charter of the International Military Tribunal", if USA attacks Iran, it is crime against peace and crime against humanity?
Asked by karim_mousaa - Thu Apr 27 16:38:27 2006 - - 15 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I don't think USA can afford another war. Iran has a pretty good military force, but US can defeat them. Just that it's going to cost lots of money and many soldiers will die. So I do not agree we should wage war on Iran now. We still facing problems in Iraq and new problems are now arising in Afghanistan. I think US should focus on helping the refugees in Darfur Region in Sudan. There's evidence of genocide over there and its time to stop the killing.
Answered by Doing the Right Thing - Thu Apr 27 16:43:49 2006
Q. According to the "Sixth Article" of "Charter of the International Military Tribunal", if USA attacks Iran, it is crime against peace and crime against humanity?
Asked by karim_mousaa - Thu Apr 27 16:38:27 2006 - - 15 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I don't think USA can afford another war. Iran has a pretty good military force, but US can defeat them. Just that it's going to cost lots of money and many soldiers will die. So I do not agree we should wage war on Iran now. We still facing problems in Iraq and new problems are now arising in Afghanistan. I think US should focus on helping the refugees in Darfur Region in Sudan. There's evidence of genocide over there and its time to stop the killing.
Answered by Doing the Right Thing - Thu Apr 27 16:43:49 2006
Liberals did you know you blew this question bigtime: Did NAZI's receive civilian trails at the end of WW II?
Q. ARTICLE 1 In pursuance of the Agreement signed on the 8th day of August 1945 by the Government of the United States of America, the Provisional Government of the French Republic, the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, there shall be established an International Military Tribunal (hereafter called "the Tribunal") for the just and prompt trial and punishment of major war criminals of the European Axis. I guess you need this to help you out in the future: TRUTH 1. the true or actual state of a matter: He tried to find out the truth. 2. conformity with fact or reality; verity: the truth of a statement. 3. a verified or indisputable… [cont.]
Asked by justice - Fri Nov 13 19:07:17 2009 - - 14 Answers - 0 Comments
A. If liberals knew history, they wouldn't be liberals.
Answered by corvette - Fri Nov 13 19:11:21 2009
Q. ARTICLE 1 In pursuance of the Agreement signed on the 8th day of August 1945 by the Government of the United States of America, the Provisional Government of the French Republic, the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, there shall be established an International Military Tribunal (hereafter called "the Tribunal") for the just and prompt trial and punishment of major war criminals of the European Axis. I guess you need this to help you out in the future: TRUTH 1. the true or actual state of a matter: He tried to find out the truth. 2. conformity with fact or reality; verity: the truth of a statement. 3. a verified or indisputable… [cont.]
Asked by justice - Fri Nov 13 19:07:17 2009 - - 14 Answers - 0 Comments
A. If liberals knew history, they wouldn't be liberals.
Answered by corvette - Fri Nov 13 19:11:21 2009
From Yahoo Answer Search: 'Nuremberg, International Military Tribunal'
Fri Sep 3 12:05:18 2010 [ refresh local cache ]
[Hide]▼
arabnews.com
Thu, 12 Aug 2010 21:36:21 GMT+00:00
Arab News ... Article 6 of the Nuremberg Charter by which the German National Socialist leaders were convicted by the International Military Tribunal and hanged...but ...
worldwar2database.com
355px x 500px | 173.30kB
[source page]
wwii0089 Italian Bomb Creates Revetment for Matilda Infantry Tank Date 07 13 2008 Italian Bomb Creates Revetment for Matilda Infantry Tank wwii0090 Defendants and Translators at the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg Date 07 14 2008 Defendants and Translators at the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg
[Hide]▲
